• Cybersecurity company Trellix has announced that it suffered a breach that enabled unauthorized access to a “portion” of its source code. It said it “recently identified” the compromise of its source code repository and that it began working with “leading forensic experts” to resolve the matter immediately. It also said it has notified law enforcement of the matter. Trellix did not disclose the

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Cybersecurity researchers at Guardio Labs have uncovered a massive phishing operation dubbed AccountDumpling that has compromised more than 30,000 Facebook accounts worldwide. Unlike conventional phishing campaigns that rely on spoofed domains or compromised SMTP servers, this Vietnamese-linked operation abuses Google AppSheet to deliver fully authenticated malicious emails. Because the messages originate from legitimate Google infrastructure, […]

    The post Massive Facebook Phishing Operation Leverages AppSheet, Netlify, and Telegram appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A critical zero-day vulnerability in cPanel and WebHost Manager (WHM) is under massive active exploitation following the public release of a sophisticated proof-of-concept exploit. Tracked as CVE-2026-41940, this flaw has already compromised tens of thousands of servers worldwide. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2026-41940, is a severe authentication bypass flaw affecting cPanel and WHM. It carries […]

    The post cPanelSniper PoC Exploit Disclosed as 44,000 Servers Reportedly Compromised appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • SOCRadar researchers have uncovered a massive Chinese cybercrime operation using the OpenClaw and Paperclip systems to automate global attacks.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • President Trump’s April 21 decision on to extend his original two-week ceasefire with Iran, less than 12 hours after he expressed reluctance to do precisely that, is giving the U.S. and Iran more time to salvage a diplomatic process defined by misleading statements, rhetorical chest-thumping, and conflicting agendas.

    While shooting has stopped for the time being, the standoff over the Strait of Hormuz remains. The good news is that neither the United States’ nor Iran’s best interests are served by a long-term conflict, which suggests both sides are at the very least keen to keep the diplomatic option open in order to determine whether a settlement to the nearly two-month long war is possible. The bad news is that Trump’s poor assumptions about how Iran would react to U.S. pressure tactics have led to poor decisions and a conflict in the Persian Gulf whose outcome remains in doubt. Far from squeezing Iranian leaders into concessions, the U.S. president has repeatedly ceded leverage in negotiation.

    Trump is notoriously unpredictable on a lot of subjects, but he’s been quite consistent on Iran throughout his presidency. His objective is clear: to prevent the country from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden all had a similar policy, even if they adopted different strategies for getting there. The difference is Trump’s unwillingness to adapt, his propensity to wield the stick without the carrot, and most of all, his unwarranted confidence in his assumptions.

    Trump’s blunders have made the goal harder. The first occurred in 2018, when he withdrew the United States from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama administration. Trump, who said JCPOA offered too much relief from sanctions while imposing too few limits on Tehran’s nuclear activity, launched a “maximum-pressure” strategy on Iran’s leaders that sought to prevent Iranian oil from reaching the global market and to cut off Iranian-linked banks from the international financial system. The hope was that Ali Khamenei, the Iranian supreme leader at the time, would come back to the table on U.S. terms.

    This calculation was mistaken. Instead of capitulating, Iran took advantage of the U.S. withdrawal by freeing itself from the deal's nuclear restrictions. More and faster centrifuges were manufactured, installed, and used. Iranian scientists began growing Tehran’s stockpile of enriched uranium. Enrichment, which was capped at 3.67 percent under the deal, moved closer to weapons-grade. And the International Atomic Energy Agency’s access became limited as the Iranians retaliated to U.S. sanctions and IAEA censure.

    By November 2023, Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was roughly 22 times larger than the deal had allowed. Today, despite last June’s U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and the thousands since Feb. 28, Iran still has roughly 1,000 pounds of 60-percent enriched uranium—leverage that Tehran wouldn’t have if Trump had chosen to stay in the agreement. 

    Some would call this ancient history. If so, it’s ancient history that has repeated itself. Trump’s war strategy against Iran leans on the same assumptions and theories at play during his first term: with enough coercion, the Iranian regime will be weakened to the point where the United States can run the table and dictate terms the Iranians will have no choice but to accept. Yet Trump’s war of choice in the Persian Gulf has merely afforded Iran more chips to play with. 

    Look no further than the Strait of Hormuz. Before the war, the international waterway was open for business. About 120 tankers transited the narrow chokepoint into the Gulf of Oman on a daily basis, servicing approximately one-fifth of the world’s crude oil supply.

    The U.S. and Israeli military campaign changed the status quo virtually overnight. Trump, inexplicably, believed Iran would give up before closing the strait. This proved to be a massive error of judgment. Perceiving the war as an existential one, Iran effectively closed the chokepoint, picking and choosing which vessels could enter and interdicting those that tried to bypass its rules.

    Traffic through the waterway has since plunged by 95 percent, resulting in price hikes on everything from fuel to fertilizer. Meanwhile, the ongoing U.S. blockade of Iranian ports has merely incentivized Tehran to drag out its own closure. Tehran has since offered to re-open the waterway if Washington ends the war, lifts the blockade and guarantees not to bomb in the future. Once again, the Iranians successfully exploited Trump’s strategy, using it as an excuse to turn the strait into a de facto Iranian lake, which before the war was a non-issue. 

    Unplugging the strait is now at least as important to the Trump administration as accounting for Iran’s nuclear material, a reality Tehran no doubt understands as it continues deliberating internally about how to manage diplomacy with Washington. Whatever tactics the regime does use, it’s highly unlikely it will agree to Trump’s wishes without a whole host of U.S. concessions in return. Some of those concessions, such as an internationally guaranteed security commitment that the United States will refrain from going to war against Iran in the future, will be difficult for Trump to swallow. Either way, any settlement is bound to be more satisfying to the regime than it needed to be. 

    There is a fundamental lesson in all of this, one U.S. officials present and future should take heed of: if you’re unwilling to recognize your mistakes out of stubbornness or genuine belief, then they risk exacerbating the very problems you seek to solve. This is why a robust, operational inter-agency process is so important and why Trump himself would do well to expand an inner circle that has thus far been highly restricted. Different departments and agencies will have different opinions on how a particular problem should be managed, what the policy should be and how it should be enacted. Presidents in the past may view these conflicting viewpoints as hindrances to effective decision-making at best and obstructionism at worst. In reality, a full-fledged debate and the existence of a constant feedback loop over what is and isn’t working is precisely how the process should function.

    The principals need to speak truth to power. And the president needs to be smart enough to listen.

    Daniel R. DePetris is a fellow at Defense Priorities and a syndicated foreign affairs columnist for the Chicago Tribune.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A newly discovered Vietnamese-linked operation has been observed using a Google AppSheet as a “phishing relay” to distribute phishing emails with an aim to compromise Facebook accounts. The activity has been codenamed AccountDumpling by Guardio, with the scheme selling the stolen accounts back through an illicit storefront run by the threat actors. In all, roughly 30,000 Facebook accounts are

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Torrance, United States / California, May 1st, 2026, CyberNewswire Criminal IP partners with Securonix to integrate Criminal IP’s Threat Intelligence into ThreatQ, allowing organizations to incorporate external IP intelligence into their existing workflows, helping security teams accelerate analysis and response with more actionable context. Unlike traditional intelligence feeds, Criminal IP provides visibility into how assets […]

    The post Criminal IP and Securonix ThreatQ Collaborate to Enhance Threat Intelligence Operations appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • A new campaign shows misconfigured Jenkins servers abused to deploy a DDoS botnet targeting gaming systems, with Valve Corporation infrastructure in focus.

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • Seven leading AI developers have deals to install tools in classified Defense Department networks, a wide spread meant to prevent "vendor lock," Pentagon officials said Friday.

    Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, OpenAI, Reflection, and SpaceX are cleared for Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7 network environments, part of a bid to streamline data synthesis, improve warfighter decision-making, and increase situational understanding and awareness.

    “Together, the War Department and these strategic partners share the conviction that American leadership in AI is indispensable to national security,” a press release said. “This leadership depends on a thriving domestic ecosystem of capable model developers that enable the full and effective use of their capabilities in support of Department missions. As mandated by President [Donald] Trump and Secretary [Pete] Hegseth, the Department will continue to envelop our warfighters with advanced AI to meet the unprecedented emerging threats of tomorrow and to strengthen our Arsenal of Freedom.”

    The new AI tools will be available via GenAI.mil, the Pentagon’s central AI platform. In late April, Google rolled out its Gemini 3.1 Pro model on the platform.

    The announcement follows tensions that exploded in late February between the Pentagon and Anthropic after the AI company refused to allow its products to be used for autonomous weapons and surveillance of Americans. The Pentagon subsequently designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk and Trump ordered federal agencies to begin offloading use of its products, though a judge has issued an injunction on those actions.

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

  • CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — After decades of development, a rocket switch in March, and a last-minute weather delay, the U.S. Space Force finally launched the last satellite of the world’s most modern GPS system into orbit.

    The final GPS III space vehicle, known as SV-10, broke through the Florida skies and into the heavens aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket last month. The new satellite offers position data three times more accurate and eight times more jamproof than previous ones, according to the Space Force. For civilians, it means more precise road directions and better food delivery. For troops, it means more sophisticated targeting and higher-security communications in austere environments. 

    It’s a no-fail mission that people—from parents getting their kids to soccer games to Air Force pilots in enemy airspace—are counting on, said Space Force Col. Stephen Hobbs, Combat Forces Command’s Mission Delta 31 commander.

    “We can talk about the captain of industry who owns a banking conglomerate and they want to make sure they have precise timing for their ATMs,” Hobbs said. “On the military side, we talk about an Army captain on the ground wanting to make sure that he or she can get from point A to point B in order to achieve their objective. We talk about a Navy captain in charge of a ship who’s trying to find their way into port … All of those captains care about this signal.” 

    As commerce and combat grow more reliant on space systems, the tempo and stakes of Space Force’s GPS launches are also rising. Defense One spoke to guardians at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station last month ahead of the GPS III launch and what it takes to keep up the demand the military and companies have for the upgraded satellite capabilities.

    The guardians said it’s a notable milestone to celebrate, but it's a brief, and short-lived recognition. The way they see it, there’s more work to be done.

    The GPS III system, which was approved by Congress in 2000, already has a replacement on its heels. The first launch of the next system, known as GPSIIIF, or Follow-On, is slated for May 2027. It’s pitched as an even more resilient signal that should allow for “over 60 times more anti-jam capabilities than legacy space vehicles," the service said.

    While preparing for those next launches, guardians are also maintaining today’s constellation, including some satellites that are decades past their planned retirement.

    “Maintaining a cadence of keeping GPS satellites on orbit, that’s the best approach,” said Capt. Brahn Kush, the government mission integration manager. “The same way they do routine oil changes is the best approach. You never realize that impact, because you kept a consistent cadence.” 

    Moving faster and accepting risk

    The final launch of the a GPS III satellite had some bumps. In late February, service officials paused  planned national-security launches aboard United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan rocket  because an anomaly had been discovered on one of the solid rocket motors.

    Service leaders told reporters at Space Symposium in Colorado Springs last month that the anomaly is still under investigation and they’re evaluating the manifest for Vulcan’s scheduled launches as they look for the cause of the problem.

    The SV-10, nicknamed the “Hedy Lamarr” for the Hollywood star and inventor, was among the affected missions. In just weeks, guardians had to switch the mission to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 instead. After those preparations were made, bad weather pushed the April 20 launch back another day.

    Guardians involved with the mission said those obstacles, while unexpected, have become easier to navigate. In 2024, the service debuted a protocol called “Rapid Response Trailblazer,” which aims to reduce the time between mission start and launch.

    Capt. Austin Guerrero, the chief of GPS III/IIIF launch operations, told Defense One that exercise was vital to getting the most recent satellites on orbit.

    “The asked us, ‘Hey, if we were to switch to a different launch provider, how fast can we get moving?’ So our team moved out, and we did that in about four months. The typical timeline for our launch processing is six. So we got that down on our first shot down to four months,” Guerrero said. “So, that kind of set the standard.” 

    That framework boosted flexibility for the remaining GPS III space vehicles launches. He said each iteration of the last three satellites was quicker and more streamlined.

    “Each launch, we take lessons learned and apply them to the next,” Guerrero said. “That’s allowed us to kind of establish a rhythm and be ready to execute very quickly.” 

    GPS IIIF satellites are to be launched in May 2027, top Space Force leaders have told Congress. The same day as the SV-10 launch, Pentagon officials unveiled the 2027 budget request, which called for 31 space launches, two new GPS satellites and their supporting infrastructure, and nearly $6 billion for satellite communications systems. 

    If Congress approves that funding, guardians at Cape Canaveral are ready to get the latest technology into the skies.

    "There's always a want or need for a new capability, and our job is to deliver on those capabilities,” Guerrero said. “And so providing capabilities again, and again, only strengthens our ability to deliver that to the world.”

    From the ground up

    Even as the final GPS III soared into orbit, the Space Force wrestled with challenges on the ground.

    A day before the SV-10 launch, the service announced it was canceling a key program meant to modernize the ground stations to keep the GPS constellation competitive and protected. 

    The Global Positioning System Next Generation Operational Control System, known as OCX, was canceled after the 15-plus-year effort faced multiple delays and consumed a staggering $6.3 billion. The Space Force formally accepted OCX from Raytheon in July, but the service discovered persistent problems within the system, the service said in a news release.

    “Despite repeated collaborative approaches by the entire government and contractor team, the challenges of onboarding the system in an operationally relevant timeline proved insurmountable,” Hobbs said in the news release. “We discovered problems across a broad range of capability areas that would put current GPS military and civilian capabilities at risk.”

    Meanwhile, the Space Force continues to improve the existing ground system. Called AEP, it can use the GPS III constellation’s upgraded capabilities such as M-Code, a highly encrypted signal for military use, the service said.

    “AEP has been repeatedly upgraded over the years to deliver new mission capabilities,” a Space Force spokesperson said. “For example, AEP provides M-Code signal broadcast to warfighters for operational use today. In addition, AEP upgrades have made it far more cyber resilient than in the past. Our plan is to make additional AEP upgrades to satisfy near-term mission needs now that OCX is cancelled. We are developing plans to increase competition in this mission area longer term.”

    The next GPS IIIF satellites will have Regional Military Protection, which will permit allied militaries to use the U.S. military’s upgraded satellite communications.

    Today’s GPS constellation includes 31 satellites, according to Autonomy Global, including some that have reported operated three times longer than initially planned.. 

    Hobbs attributes that to the engineers, navigators, and guardians who’ve kept those satellites functioning and on orbit. As the service works to get the next generation of satellites into the skies, he knows they’ll be called upon again to keep them functioning for decades to come.

    “Now that we’ve launched all the IIIs that we’re going to have, are there ways that we can extend the life of that capability to make sure it’s there for the warfighter when he or she needs it?,” the Mission Delta 31 commander said. “If all we did was launch the III and then not try and do everything we can to keep it alive as long as possible…then we wouldn’t be doing our due diligence for the American taxpayer.”

    ]]>

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶

    ¶¶¶¶¶