-
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Thursday renewed sanctions against Russian cryptocurrency exchange platform Garantex for facilitating ransomware actors and other cybercriminals by processing more than $100 million in transactions linked to illicit activities since 2019. The Treasury said it’s also imposing sanctions on Garantex’s successor, Grinex
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
We used to think of privacy as a perimeter problem: about walls and locks, permissions, and policies. But in a world where artificial agents are becoming autonomous actors — interacting with data, systems, and humans without constant oversight — privacy is no longer about control. It’s about trust. And trust, by definition, is about what happens when you’re not looking. Agentic AI — AI that
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
Cisco has released security updates to address a maximum-severity security flaw in Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on affected systems. The vulnerability, assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-20265 (CVSS score: 10.0), affects the RADIUS subsystem implementation that could permit an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
AI is expected to play a central role in the Golden Dome air-defense system, from helping to integrate today’s sensors and interceptors to accelerating the detection and tracking of threats, according to slides shown by Defense Department officials last week at an industry day in Huntsville, Alabama. The slides also provided new detail on the Pentagon’s ambitions for missile-killing satellites and other matters.
More than 3,000 people from the space and missile-defense sectors attended the daylong event, which was held amid—but was not formally affiliated with—the industry-group 2025 Space and Missile Defense Symposium. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth forbade Defense Department officials to discuss Golden Dome at the SMDS, and reporters were barred from the industry day, whose discussions were unclassified.
Asked for details on the proceedings, a Missile Defense Agency spokesperson referred Defense One to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which sent an email saying, in part, “The Golden Dome for America office is examining current and future solutions across the services and interagency to identify the most effective ways to modernize and quickly field the capabilities our nation needs to protect our homeland.”
Defense One obtained a copy of the slides, whose authenticity was confirmed by several attendees, including a government official.
An AI-powered Golden Dome
New automation and AI tools—including an “AI-Enabled Fire Control Concept”—were a central feature of the industry-day presentations.
AI is expected to help network a wider variety of radars and missile batteries, and may enable the tracking of far more missiles than is possible today.
“The reason you need AI help is because, instead of a handful of missiles, or a dozen or so from North Korea or Iran, now we’re talking about what could be dozens and dozens or hundreds from Russia or China. There’s a quantity challenge and then there’s a time challenge,” one attendee said. “You want to be able to hit these as quickly as you can, and AI can sort through that much, much faster than a human can.”
Officials didn’t provide details on what an AI-enabled fire control concept would mean in practice, but some aspects of missile defense, such as target warning, already have AI elements.
Speaking at the Space and Missile Defense Symposium—but not on the restricted industry panel—Dan Wald, director of artificial intelligence at Booz Allen Hamilton, said AI could serve a variety of tasks related to space-based tracking and interception of missiles without necessarily removing humans from oversight of firing on incoming threats. He outlined a vision for AI-enabled fire control where humans play more of a supervisory role than an active one—but still act faster.
Wald described it as “moving the human from 'in the loop' to 'on the loop' for fire control…This smart fire control can basically give recommendations for intercept or for applications of resources. This is where we can reduce the amount of people that are necessary to close that loop from a dozen to, you know, two men in a can.”
Maj. Dwight Hicks, space strategy officer at Space and Missile Defense Command, said AI could also help with rearming and maintenance, allowing for streamlined logistics.
“You shouldn’t have to wait for a platoon leader or platoon sergeant to say, ‘Hey, I need more ammunition, or I need more big bullets or beans.’ It should be automated. So if you know a big launcher is shooting missiles, there should be an automated count as that is going, and it triggers for it to go to the rear and the rear to start moving forward.”
Some said AI could also help the program reach its ambitious 2028 goal by speeding up testing. One slide describes a greatly accelerated testing “cadence,” as well as frequent and ongoing tests related to software, ground sensors, and more. And the Pentagon is looking for companies that can conduct more of their own testing, and show that it is rigorous, one attendee said.
“What they’re trying to do is figure out ways to accelerate testing. For example, can you apply AI to try to accelerate some of the data review and analysis? That would be a huge advantage. And also, can you do more piecemeal testing, building up to integrated testing?” they said.
Missile-killing satellites
Even space-based interceptor tests don’t have to be as expensive as they might seem, one attendee said. “If you want to test a space-based interceptor, you don’t have to necessarily launch it into orbit and then test it there. You could do suborbital testing of your kill vehicle with much cheaper launch costs and a much faster schedule.”
The Golden Dome program, at least at this phase, isn’t seeking a single type of space-based interceptor from one provider. One slide mentions the Brilliant Pebbles program, canceled in 1994, which envisioned a constellation of missile-shooting satellites from Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman: “Advances in technology, manufacturing, and cost curves since the Brilliant Pebbles program make space-based interceptors feasible — but not simple. The U.S. has never built a re-entry vehicle that can close an intercept.”
The planned Golden Dome interceptors will have to do more than what planners originally envisioned for Brilliant Pebbles. Brilliant Pebbles was conceived in the 1980s as a means to destroy missiles in the earliest (and most-targetable) part of their flight, when they are just lifting off into space. It was later expanded to include the mid-course phase in the early 1990s. One slide on Golden Dome says that program officials want the new interceptors to be able to down missiles at every stage of flight, from lift off through the mid-course and glide phase, a feature of modern, highly maneuverable hypersonics that was not really a consideration decades ago.
Attendees said that suggests the program will be open to buying several types of interceptors to provide redundancy.
Closer than you think
The prospect of space-based interceptors, a concept that has existed for decades but never been effectively deployed, has garnered much attention. But the main thrust of the Golden Dome architecture, as laid out in the industry day presentations, will be tying together a wide variety of radars, sensors, and missiles already in use or in development, such as Northrop Grumman’s Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system, Lockheed Martin’s Patriot PAC-3 air and missile defense system, the in-development Next Generation Interceptor, the Integrated Battle Command System, and other systems from Boeing and Raytheon.
Pentagon plans call for bringing these together, developing new “common launch” missile batteries, and deploying 11 short-range missile batteries throughout the United States, according to multiple slides.
Golden Dome also will work much faster than today’s missile-defense regime, the slides say. Today’s architecture is challenging because of the lags in communication “across the kill chain,” whereas officials want the new system to include “Next-Gen” attributes such as “seamless integration with joint assets—any sensor, any shooter” and “integrated left-right of launch,” meaning intelligence collection and sharing long before an adversary missile launch has occurred.
That integration is the biggest challenge, attendees said: coordinating the data from sensors in various locations, on land and in space, and ensuring compatibility across a wide variety of launch systems from multiple vendors. “How do you command and control all of that? That’s the hard part, especially when you’re talking about thousands of space-based interceptors as well as a growing number of ground-based radars and missile systems,” one person said.
It will require more than just existing missile defense pieces.
Tom Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at CSIS, declined to speak about the industry day specifically, but pointed to a previous CSIS publication outlining the need to incorporate radar, sensors, and satellites from outside the Defense Department—such as NOAA assets—to increase interception chances, but also complexity.
U.S. defense architecture today, while highly complex, still requires significant manual coordination among the services under extreme time pressure, all taking quick action to train radars or other sensors on new threats, one attendee explained. That’s one reason AI and automation play such a big role in the Pentagon’s Golden Dome plans.
Teams forming
SpaceX, which today is the cheapest launch provider and has launched its own satellite constellation, is considered one of the most competitive companies for Golden Dome contracts. However, it goes unmentioned in the slides and was largely missing from the day's conversations.
Why is that? One attendee said company officials “haven't shown a real interest” in Golden Dome, aside from the need for lots of launches, for which they are the favorite. “I would be very surprised that they actually try to build a space-based interceptor. I think what they would probably do is try to be on everybody's team.”
Speaking outside the industry day, a Northrop Grumman official said they are exploring new ways to work with competitors to solve the data and integration challenges and “collaborate across those company boundaries quickly. That’s what’s going to enable Golden Dome.”
Amanda Pound, advanced programs development director at Lockheed Martin, also speaking outside the event, sounded a similar note. “SpaceX has very capable vehicles. But there are also many other launch providers. It’s gotten cheaper, more sustainable over time.”
The Golden Dome program might reshape the nascent space business sector, even diluting SpaceX’s current leadership position.
“The overall effect of this is to create a bunch of new potential SpaceXs, because now you have the economics of scale behind you to really launch the space economy.”
Why so silent?
The curtain of secrecy around unclassified discussions renewed questions about the controversial program. Experts have expressed doubt about the administration's claims about timeline, projected cost, practicality, and effect on deterrence.
“‘Golden Dome’ probably sounded good to the president, and now no one is going to talk him out of it—especially given that the administration is willing to throw mountains of money at such a program, just as Reagan did,” Tom Nichols wrote in The Atlantic. “Hegseth can order his people not to talk about it at public gatherings, but at some point, the administration should answer the two most important questions about an expensive system that could destabilize nuclear deterrence: What is Golden Dome supposed to do, and does it have any chance of working?”
]]>¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
Eight hundred Air and Army National Guardsmen began their mission in D.C. early Wednesday morning, helping the city’s temporarily federalized police through “monument security, community safety patrols, protecting federal facilities and officers, traffic control posts and area beautification,” Pentagon spokeswoman Kingsley Wilson told reporters.
That includes presence on the National Mall, Wilson said, though she did not answer questions about the specific crimes the Trump administration believes need to be stamped out near the monuments and museums.
“It's dangerous all around the city,” Wilson said. “I think another important point of having National Guardsmen all around D.C. is that as it is also a deterrent, and it makes people feel safe, and it lets everyone know that D.C. is going to be a city in which we can be proud of, and we are standing alongside our federal partners to execute on the president's directive.”
Guardsmen from a variety of military specialties, not just military police, have been tapped for the mission, a Defense official, who was not authorized to speak on the record, told reporters. Troops will neither be armed nor have weapons in their vehicles, the official said. Though they will be assisting law enforcement, the official didn’t know yet whether the troops would be patrolling alongside police or would be in close enough communication to signal them if a threat occurred.
Though the Guard hasn’t been tasked with arresting suspects or other law enforcement functions, their state active duty designation would allow for that should the president order it.
The designation is distinct from the federalized deployments of Guardsmen in D.C. during the summer of 2020 and winter of 2021, when troops helped with crowd control but were specifically barred from performing law-enforcement functions.
“They will remain until law and order has been restored in the district, as determined by the president, standing as the gatekeepers of our great nation's capital,” Wilson said.
She did not say how the restoration of law and order would be measured. In a Monday press conference announcing his takeover of the D.C. police and the Guard deployment, President Trump offered false and exaggerated crime statistics to justify his action.
This week, a U.S. district court heard testimony in Newsom v. Trump, a lawsuit brought by the state of California against the administration’s controversial deployment of some 4,700 National Guardsmen and Marines to southern California. The presiding judge has not yet ruled on the suit.
]]>¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
On May 29, the Yuanxingzhe-1 suborbital rocket took off from a platform in the Yellow Sea, carrying with it not just the hopes of its maker—a Chinese commercial launch firm called Space Epoch—but also the prospects for China’s next phase in its space power.
The 64-meter rocket came to a hover about 2.5 km up, then landed vertically at the Oriental Spaceport in Haiyang, Shandong, marking the first known successful maritime vertical takeoff and vertical landing by a Chinese rocket company.
The test flight drew far less international coverage than, say, the pioneering SpaceX flights that preceded it. But it underscores China’s rapidly accelerating efforts to master reusable rocket technology. According to the company, the test verified guidance control, engine throttling, and sea-based recovery procedures for future reusable launch missions.
It also signals a strategic shift: Beijing is not only expanding its domestic space launch capacity, but also preparing a logistics backbone to support resilient, low-cost access to orbit that could reshape both commercial and military space operations.
China’s reusable-rocket objectives have expanded rapidly over the last five years, driven by both state-owned and private-sector space firms. Besides Space Epoch, there is Landscape, a 10-year-old, Beijing-based company whose Zhuque-2 became the world’s first methane-liquid oxygen rocket to reach space in 2023.
Its follow-on Zhuque-3 is designed for full-stage reusability. In September, the slender stainless-steel rocket launched from a remote expanse of China’s Gobi Desert, hovered in mid-air, and then descended vertically back to Earth, settling gently on its landing legs. With a 21.3-ton payload capacity and planned for the second half of 2025 and stage recovery targeted for 2026, Landspace is laying the foundation for a parallel architecture of low-cost, high-frequency launches that could transform both commercial and military space operations.
Yet another Chinese competitor is iSpace, whose Hyperbola-2 test vehicle performed a successful 1.5-kilometer vertical takeoff and landing in 2022. iSpace’s roadmap LinkSpace are investing in VTVL architecture at various stages of development.
Meanwhile, China’s state-owned aerospace giants are working on their own reusable rockets to support lunar exploration and the Chinese space station. China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, or CASC, is redesigning its super heavy-lift Long March 9 to include a reusable first stage. Test flights are expected later this decade.
By integrating private cargo systems into state-run infrastructure like the Tiangong space station, China is not just building new capability, but also accelerating a shift toward commercial participation in national space goals. Reusable rockets reduce launch costs and raise launch frequency, allowing for rapid fielding of satellite constellations. Frequent, cost-efficient missions using recycled boosters have already begun to revolutionize the commercial launch market.
China’s broader space ecosystem is surging beyond just these tests and plans. After a record 68 launch aboard the new Lijian-2 rocket in September. Tailored for rapid, time-sensitive scientific deliveries, Qingzhou and Haoloong will supplement the existing Tianzhou fleet, significantly improving delivery timelines and mission cadence.
While China’s progress is impressive, it still lags the United States, particularly SpaceX, which has launched more than 300 times. Landspace and other Chinese firms are still testing prototypes. If Landspace’s planned orbital flight and first-stage recovery are successful, that would still place China a few years behind SpaceX. However, reusability is more than just landing. It involves ground operations, manufacturing optimization, refurbishment cycles, and cost analysis, areas where SpaceX holds substantial institutional advantages.
China’s space sector also faces unique challenges. Regulatory oversight is tighter, commercial players are more intertwined with state policy, and the ecosystem of suppliers and launch infrastructure is still developing. Moreover, SpaceX enjoys a lead in global launch contracts, while China remains largely dependent on state-sponsored projects and domestic clients.
Nonetheless, China’s ability to close the gap should not be underestimated. The country’s space sector Technology-sharing with CASC and overlapping military-civil fusion projects give the country a potent ecosystem for space tech development.
With reusable systems in hand, Chinese firms will be able to deploy satellite constellations more rapidly and affordably, reshaping the global connectivity landscape. Guowang is a proposed 13,000-satellite low-Earth-orbit constellation, akin to SpaceX’s Starlink, intended to improve broadband coverage across China and the Global South. This looming shift carries deep implications, not only for the commercial satellite industry, but also for military capabilities and geopolitical influence.
Reusable rockets would planned International Lunar Research Station with Russia, will depend on launch systems that are both scalable and cost-effective.
The story of reusable rocket technology is frequently portrayed in the United States as being about innovation, personal prestige, or even the survival of humankind. For China, it is a strategic imperative. A tightly integrated system, in which new private firms operate with state backing and strategic alignment, aims to construct a resilient, scalable space logistics architecture for China. Its effect will be felt in not just markets, but in geopolitics and even warfare, both on Earth and in orbits beyond.
P.W. Singer is Strategist at New America and the author of multiple books on technology and security.
Alex Nova is a BluePath Labs associate and analyst specializing in emerging technologies, international affairs, and national security.
]]>¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
·
How an Alaskan military base is preparing for Trump-Putin meeting. President Trump is set to host Russia’s Vladimir Putin tomorrow at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, just north of Anchorage. The joint Air Force-Army base, which today supports F-22 Raptors, historically has been used to counter the Soviet Union and launch intercepts of Russian and Chinese aircraft.The location begs questions about the logistics of securing the site. Base officials declined to answer any of them, deferred questions about preparation for the visit to the White House, which declined to provide further information, citing operational security.
But former Air Force officials said that with appropriate precautions, the base is well-suited to host the event. Ravi Chaudhary, a former assistant Air Force secretary for installations, echoed confidence that the base will be able to deliver a secure environment, though he expressed concern over the administration’s problems with security protocols. Defense One’s Audrey Decker has more, here.
Update: For the first time, European military industries are now contributing more for Ukraine than their U.S. counterparts, Defense News reported Wednesday citing new data from the German Kiel Institute for the World Economy. According to the latest figures, Europe has now contributed about $5 billion more than the U.S. going back to February 2022, when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Other notable takeaways:
- The U.S. remains the single-largest provider of infantry fighting vehicles, howitzers, multiple launch rocket systems, and air defense systems;
- Poland has provided Ukraine with the most tanks (354);
- Also: “many of the weapons now going to Ukraine come straight from the military-industrial output of the sending countries, rather than from preexisting stockpiles,” Defense News writes. Read more, here.
For this week’s recommended #LongRead, we suggest author Kevin Maurer’s extended meditation on the Army’s Best Ranger Competition, aka the “Ranger Olympics,” with an accompanying photospread by Kendrick Brinson for The Atlantic (gift link).
Maurer’s probably been to Afghanistan more times than you, and he co-wrote the first account of the bin Laden raid, “No Easy Day,” so he’s learned a bit about America’s special operations forces over the course of his two decades of coverage. Leveraging that deep background, this week he turned in an occasionally-ruminating account of what his Atlantic editors suggest “may be the hardest physical competition in the world.” (Note: Some ultra-endurance expedition races like this, e.g., would certainly come close, if not exceed the cumulative demands on the body and team. We recommend you read Maurer’s account and decide for yourself.)
A quick summary: “Over the course of three days,” 52 teams of two soldiers each “march and run dozens of miles, crawl through obstacle courses, and navigate swamps at night. They carry 50 pounds in their rucksacks, climb 60-foot ropes, and sleep, at most, for four hours at a time.” Only 16 teams made it to the competition’s third and final day.
One notable wrinkle: “[A]mong the 104 soldiers on the starting line at Fort Benning was a 25-year-old first lieutenant named Gabrielle White, a West Point graduate who was the first woman to compete for the Best Ranger title; and in part because, to her opponents on the course, the fact that she was a woman did not seem to matter,” Maurer writes, and added, “The only thing that mattered to the Rangers I met was that she had qualified for the competition.”
So who came out on top? Spoiler alert: “Both look[ed], a bit disconcertingly, like action figures,” Maurer writes. Read on to find out.
Additional reading:
- “For Booz Allen, 2025 is the year of the ‘pivot,’” Defense One’s Lauren C. Williams reported Wednesday after spending some time with Andrea Inserra, president of Boox Allen Hamilton’s global defense business;
- And “F-15 Ride-Along Passenger Accidentally Ejects While On The Ground,” The War Zone reported Thursday.
Welcome to this Thursday edition of The D Brief, a newsletter dedicated to developments affecting the future of U.S. national security, brought to you by Ben Watson with Bradley Peniston. Share your tips and feedback here. And if you’re not already subscribed, you can do that here. On this day two years ago, Donald Trump was indicted for the fourth time in 2023 when he and 18 others were charged in Georgia for attempting to overturn the state’s results in the 2020 election.
Trump 2.0
National defense strategy check-in: As National Guardsmen are sent for a second time in recent months to a U.S. city whose local leaders made no requests for their support, we may be seeing the Trump administration’s new national defense strategy play out in unprecedented ways ill-matched to military capabilities, Defense One’s Meghann Myers reported Wednesday.
Currently, the administration is operating under an interim NDS that is “focused on defending the homeland,” with China and the Indo-Pacific a lower priority, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told the Senate Appropriations Committee in June. The interim NDS, which is classified, was finalized in March. An unclassified version exists but has not been released to the public—another change from the Biden administration, which published unclassified versions of both the interim and final NDS.
But civilian and uniformed Pentagon officials have said publicly that this administration is prioritizing the geographical U.S. in its national security policy, a departure from recent administrations that have described conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific or terrorism in the Middle East as the biggest threats to America. “I think we're learning in real-time what that means,” Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International studies, told Defense One.
Big picture: What’s now playing out is the administration’s interpretation of domestic defense, Myers reports. Continue reading, here.
A second opinion: “[T]oday, general officers no longer seem to see themselves as guardians of the constitutional order,” warn former White House National Security Council members Steven Simon and Jonathan Stevenson, writing Wednesday for the New York Times.
Consulting history, author Garrett Graff combed through the many statements of German exiles and refugees who fled the country during the march of fascism in the 1930s. His retrospective, gleaned during research for his newest book, “The Devil Reached Toward the Sky: An Oral History of the Making and Unleashing of the Atomic Bomb,” at times reflects similar questioning contemporary officials and scholars may find themselves pondering—including questions like, “When should we resign? Now? Maybe it’s not bad enough yet? But when?”
Related reading: “Trump Has a New Definition of Human Rights,” historian Anne Applebaum writes for The Atlantic in response to new reports from Trump’s State Department. Topline read: The State Department’s revised reports “contain harsh and surprising assessments of democratic U.S. allies, including the U.K., Romania, Germany, and Brazil, and softer depictions of some dictatorships and other countries favored by Trump or his entourage,” like El Salvador and Israel, Applebaum writes.
“The State Department’s motivation is not hard to guess,” says Applebaum. “Because the Trump administration is sending prisoners to El Salvador, the department massaged the report to avoid the glaring truth: The U.S. is endangering people by sending them to Salvadoran prisons.” More, here.
Foreign aid update: The White House can continue withholding congressionally-appropriated funds, for now. A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 Wednesday (PDF) that the Trump administration can decline to disperse billions in foreign aid earmarked by Congress, including $10 billion for global health programs through 2028.
One catch: “[T]he panel of judges did not rule on whether the terminations of funds appropriated by Congress were constitutional,” NPR reports.
Said an attorney for those suing the administration: “[O]ur lawsuit will continue regardless as we seek permanent relief from the Administration’s unlawful termination of the vast majority of foreign assistance. In the meantime, countless people will suffer disease, starvation, and death from the Administration’s unconscionable decision to withhold life-saving aid from the world’s most vulnerable people.” More, here.
Deportation nation update: Recruitment meme edition. Dozens of memes used by White House social media accounts appear designed “to normalize mass deportation and Christian nationalist narratives,” experts told WIRED, reporting Tuesday.
And “DHS is recruiting using a not-so-subtle reference to a 1978 book from white nationalist William Gayley Simpson,” observed researcher Hannah Gais of the Southern Poverty Law Center, writing Tuesday on social media.
Additional reading:
- “GSA introduces USAi.Gov to streamline AI adoption across government,” Nextgov reported Thursday;
- “Trump Bureau of Labor Statistics nominee was a 'bystander' outside Capitol on Jan. 6, White House says,” NBC News reported Wednesday;
- “CDC shooting marks latest in a string of hostility directed at health workers. Many aren't surprised,” the Associated Press reported Wednesday;
- “America’s global classroom is emptying,” Quartz reported Wednesday;
- And “US national debt reaches a record $37 trillion,” AP reported Wednesday.
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
Multiple HTTP/2 implementations have been found susceptible to a new attack technique called MadeYouReset that could be explored to conduct powerful denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. “MadeYouReset bypasses the typical server-imposed limit of 100 concurrent HTTP/2 requests per TCP connection from a client. This limit is intended to mitigate DoS attacks by restricting the number of simultaneous
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
Japan’s CERT coordination center (JPCERT/CC) on Thursday revealed it observed incidents that involved the use of a command-and-control (C2) framework called CrossC2, which is designed to extend the functionality of Cobalt Strike to other platforms like Linux and Apple macOS for cross-platform system control. The agency said the activity was detected between September and December 2024, targeting
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
-
You check that the windows are shut before leaving home. Return to the kitchen to verify that the oven and stove were definitely turned off. Maybe even circle back again to confirm the front door was properly closed. These automatic safety checks give you peace of mind because you know the unlikely but potentially dangerous consequences of forgetting – a break-in, fire, or worse. Your
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶


